BMN 307, the most advanced AAV-PAH program, was paused due to hepatocellular carcinoma signals in a mouse study, raising concerns about insertional mutagenesis risk with AAV integration in dividing hepatocytes. Whether these mouse findings translate to human risk remains debated, as the Pah-enu2 mouse model has inherent liver pathology. Pre-existing anti-AAV antibodies exclude a significant fraction of patients from AAV gene therapy. Transgene expression durability is uncertain — episomal AAV genomes may be diluted with hepatocyte turnover, particularly in pediatric patients with growing livers, potentially requiring retreatment that is precluded by anti-AAV immunity. For a splice-site variant like c.1316-1G>A, direct correction approaches (e.g., U1 snRNA modification or splice-switching ASOs) could theoretically restore normal splicing but remain preclinical. The dietary management alternative, while burdensome, is effective at preventing intellectual disability if initiated early, making the risk-benefit calculus for gene therapy more complex than for diseases without existing treatment options.