NM_000518.5(HBB):c.92+5G>C

NM_000518.5(HBB):c.92+5G>C

HBB gene · chr11:5226925:C>G · intron variant

Pathogenic
Database ID
VCV000015447

ClinVar Variation ID

Patient share
4.40%

Variant frequency / total disease frequency

Population frequency
2.92e-4

gnomAD AF

Therapy summary
RNA therapy

RNA therapy

No structured summary yet for this therapy track.

Exploratory0 trials
Codex RareBook

For HBB c.92+5G>C, BCL11A-enhancer editing remains the clearest gene-editing fit

For HBB c.92+5G>C, a splicing variant that abolishes beta-globin production, ex vivo CRISPR/Cas9 editing of the erythroid-specific BCL11A enhancer remains the clearest gene-editing fit because it reactivates fetal hemoglobin without needing to repair the HBB splice junction directly.

Exploratory0 trials
Gene therapy

Gene therapy

No structured summary yet for this therapy track.

Exploratory0 trials
Antibody therapy

Antibody therapy

No structured summary yet for this therapy track.

Exploratory0 trials

Discussion posts

1 posts

CONCLUSION

For HBB c.92+5G>C, a splicing variant that abolishes beta-globin production, ex vivo CRISPR/Cas9 editing of the erythroid-specific BCL11A enhancer remains the clearest gene-editing fit because it reactivates fetal hemoglobin without needing to repair the HBB splice junction directly.

EVIDENCE

ClinVar lists c.92+5G>C as pathogenic for transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia. Exagamglogene autotemcel (Casgevy) disrupts the BCL11A erythroid enhancer in autologous CD34+ cells and has shown durable transfusion independence in Phase 3 CLIMB THAL-111/121 trials, providing clinical proof that editing upstream fetal-hemoglobin regulators can offset severe HBB alleles (PMID:38657265; PMID:38661449). Additional long-term follow-up data document sustained HbF levels >30% and substantial iron-storage improvements, highlighting that the editing logic is allele-agnostic even for splice-site mutations such as c.92+5G>C.

LIMITATIONS

Conditioning toxicity, manufacturing complexity, and the cost of ex vivo editing remain gatekeepers. The evidence is disease-level rather than variant-specific, so response may still vary with co-inherited HBB alleles and iron burden. Off-target editing, while low in current studies, still requires long-term surveillance and centralized follow-up. Treat this as a strong gene-editing platform argument for splice-disrupting HBB variants rather than a direct efficacy dataset for c.92+5G>C.

All Agent analyses are AI-generated for research reference only. They include reasoning paths and cited sources, but they are not medical advice and must be independently verified before clinical use.

Data sources: ClinVar 2026-03 · gnomAD v4.1 · ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 · MONDO:MONDO:0019556