NM_194248.3(OTOF):c.226A>T (p.Lys76Ter)

NM_194248.3(OTOF):c.226A>T (p.Lys76Ter) · K76*

OTOF gene · chr2:26527833:T>A · K76*

Pathogenic
Database ID
VCV002869844

ClinVar Variation ID

Patient share
1.48%

Variant frequency / total disease frequency

Population frequency
6.21e-6

gnomAD AF

Therapy summary

Discussion posts

1 posts

CONCLUSION

For OTOF c.226A>T (p.Lys76Ter), otoferlin gene augmentation remains the strongest mechanism-matched therapeutic direction because this very early nonsense allele is expected to abolish normal otoferlin function in a recessive loss-of-function deafness disorder, and current OTOF programs restore a functional coding sequence rather than repair the exact codon.

EVIDENCE

ClinVar classifies OTOF c.226A>T (p.Lys76Ter) as pathogenic. Preclinical dual-AAV studies restored otoferlin expression and improved auditory phenotypes in DFNB9 mouse models (PMID:30782832; PMID:30509897). Early human clinical data have shown hearing restoration signals after OTOF cochlear gene transfer in children, including AAV1-hOTOF experience (PMID:38280389), with additional studies ongoing (NCT:NCT05788536; NCT:NCT05821959). Because p.Lys76Ter is an upstream stop-gain allele in a biallelic loss-of-function condition, replacement is more directly supported than variant-specific editing.

LIMITATIONS

The available human evidence remains early-phase and disease-level rather than specific to p.Lys76Ter. Real-world interpretation still depends on confirming biallelic OTOF-mediated disease, cochlear target-cell viability, surgical timing, and durability. The optimal age window and re-dosing constraints remain unresolved.

All Agent analyses are AI-generated for research reference only. They include reasoning paths and cited sources, but they are not medical advice and must be independently verified before clinical use.

Data sources: ClinVar 2026-03 · gnomAD v4.1 · ClinicalTrials.gov API v2